Home_greyopenFATE - openSUSE feature tracking > #307522
Dashboard | Search | Sign up | Login

Please login or register to be able to edit or vote this feature.

Improve font rendering on openSUSE

Feature state

Rejected Information
Rejected Information


It would be great if font rendering in openSUSE looks like Mac OS X's or Windows' with Cleartype. Ubuntu has improved it a little. I think this could be important for openSUSE interface.


icons/user_comment.png T. S. wrote: (9 years ago)

Could you please give more information on how to achieve this?
Afaic cleartype is disabled in opensuse because of microsoft patents.
There is a howto for enabling it: http://opensuse-community.org/SubpixelHinting

icons/user_comment.png J. E. wrote: (9 years ago)

And also, subpixel rendering leaves an ugly color trail on CRTs, that is even noticable on LCDs.

icons/user_comment.png R. D. wrote: (8 years ago)

Having installed Windows 7, and having gone through a wizard for their font rendering, I am not so convinced by their technology; I found their examples rather fuzzy and unclear on a good Pro CRT.  Most font issues I see in Linux are cured by CNTRL-+; though I have seen screenshots of some disgusting fonts in YaST post-installation.

icons/user_comment.png I. M. wrote: (8 years ago)

To be honest, working in OpenSUSE irritates my eyes very fast because of the bad font anti-aliasing.  This however does not occur in Windows or not even Ubuntu.

icons/user_comment.png I. M. wrote: (8 years ago)

Please read this article on Linux Journal: http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/prettier-fonts-way

This entirely solves the patenting issues.

icons/user_comment.png J. M. wrote: (8 years ago)

-1 - ClearType is ugly itself.

the usual perceived problem is that fonts on webpages are ugly, but this is solved by installing MS core fonts - in other words, it is not a question of font rendering, but a question of using ugly (substitute) fonts in the first place.

as for desktop fonts, to my poor eyes it seems that they are good enough by default - care for some comparison screenshots?

icons/user_comment.png J. E. wrote: (6 years ago)

Wikipedia has a reasonable explanation and pictures of the difference between Antialias and AA+ClearType. Yes, AA without ClearType makes fonts perhaps look more gray.

And this potential extra gray affect seems to have been ignored on features.opensuse.org where the CSS author decided to use #444444 instead of #000000... duh.

icons/user_comment.png J. M. wrote: (6 years ago)

i understand the difference between AA, subpixel rendering and various methods of font hinting. what i meant by comparison screenshots is "opensuse default" versus "how it's supposed to look" (in OP's opinion).
again, to me, default openSUSE's font configuration looks reasonably well

icons/user_comment.png J. M. wrote: (6 years ago)

Using OpenSUSE 12.1 + KDE 4.7.4 with freetype2-devel 2.4.7 my fonts are crystal clear. (A DVI cable helps!)
I have anti-aliasing enabled, and sub-pixel rendering to RBG, and hinting style to Medium.

I think this is as good as it gets, and the issue has been solved with freetype 2.4 released last year.

Last change: 6 years ago
Score: 24
  • Negative: 4
  • Neutral: 2
  • Positive: 28
Feature Export
Application-xmlXML   Text-x-logPlaintext   PrinterPrint